We have become a nation of parrots, listening to the "tell-lie-vision" (watching the Bailey Twins on Rumble is no different), the screens programming the masses so they become good parrots, channeling the latest propaganda campaign from their heroes. The sky is always falling, and there is always going to be the next thing to worry about, for the corporation's gain and your loss. It is the same play from the age-old playbook, used over and over again. They don’t change it because, somehow, no one seems to catch on. They think this one is real and even make fun of other groups for falling for similar campaigns. Like calling people sheeple for getting a shot, simultaneously singing the praises of Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine simply because you heard it was a miracle drug from a translator/savior smarter than you that profits from your ignorance.
Listen to these famous, pharmaceutical shills shepherd the sheep to the other side of the industry. Click on the photo for the sales pitch. According to these "high-ly" qualified gentlemen, you should be taking methylene blue, ivermectin, and hydroxychloroquine. Obviously. Clearly, they are the good drugs that actually save lives and cure cancer. They do an excellent job of convincing you because they are somehow privy to information you and I don’t have and are on our side because they are promoting things that were “banned.” Well, actually, they were never banned, just threatened to be banned so you would believe they were the next miracle toxic chemical concoction that will save your life from a “virus” that never actually existed. But thank God for the pharmaceuticals right Mel? You trust these multimillionaires because they are on your side. Listen to them sing the praises of RFK Jr. the safe vaccine man, and continually reel you in with their science of 80% truth we do agree with, and 20% lies to get you to poison yourself. And right on schedule, half of the country fell for it. Exactly where they want you.
How do they get you to take dangerous black-box warning drugs made with toxic chemicals? They use miracle testimonials and random information told as fact by a scientist that won the Nobel prize or died mysteriously bringing the information to light. They know how we operate and use it to their advantage, profiting from your ignorance. Who can resist a miraculous testimonial? It cured my son’s autism, and my uncle’s wife’s cousin’s step-brother no longer has cancer. The scared masses run to the nearest drug store and get it before it's banned. Remember how much sales of vitamins and supplements went up in Canada after they threatened to ban them. The use of illegal drugs skyrockets when they wage war on them. Go on a diet, even one time and end up obese. They know the psychology and will continually use it against the weak-minded. Which MAY have been you, but not after enlightening yourself with my substack and exponentially so with
work. Way to go team!Yes, thankfully you have taken the reigns and will no longer get distracted by the latest shiny object and brand new never before seen miracle cure. But for those uninitiated, they are like moths to a fear-based narrative flame, which all makes sense if you don’t think about it. Like EVERYTHING they try to convince us of in the field of one world religion science. For example, “The soils are depleted, so you have to take vitamins and supplements to get the necessary nutrients so you don’t die of deficiency diseases.” Sounds like something Anderson Cooper would spew out of his thin lips as his delicate hand points to a scary chart showing death, disease and mayhem for those to stupid not to take the drugs they are selling. We all know the pharmaceutical industry owns 70% of advertising on main stream media. Andy the Vanderbilt boy certainly would never bite the hand that feeds him. Nor would Joe Rogan and RFK Jr. They are selling you pharmaceutical drugs just like Anderson. But unlike Anderson, they are claiming to be on your side-the truth free-dum side, shilling spilling the industries secrets to keep you healthy. And profiting just a lil bit.
Remember, the vitamin and supplement industry is a 50 billion dollar a year empire, with North America accounting for 17 billion, about 1/3 of sales globally. The empire needs to keep running and generate more profits in order to meet the projected 7% CAGR by 2030. By the way, prenatal supplements account for $280 million of the North American market! Don’t forget the link to processed food addiction may get it’s roots in prenatal vitamins you can read about here. This is a cash cow for the pharmaceutical companies that supply the toxic chemicals; 44 gallon drums of raw chemicals materials to private label companies. And RAKE in the revenue from the illnesses caused from consuming the private label chemicals. The Canadian market is just as robust, and the threatened “ban” boosted their market significantly so they can catch up with the Jones’s Market (USA). Yes, they play the public like a fiddle. Click the video below to see actual footage, in real time of the pharmaceutical puppets influencing the crowds with their tactics. If you bought ivermectin, zinc, iodine, vitamin C, vitamin D3 you are the bird in this video.
When you have a multi-billion dollar industry, you have to have multiple narratives to keep the various public groups spending their meager wages on expensive urine vitamins and supplements. One of the latest fear-based propaganda spins is that all the soils are depleted of nutrients, so you HAVE to supplement your diet to avoid deficiency diseases. Yes, it is not the chemicals sprayed on the food making you sick, it’s not getting enough chemicals that is making you sick. Below is the propaganda on one side and the other is a brief glance at reality. Something I threw together to sprinkle a little reality into the fear based propaganda machine. You do not have a chemical deficiency. Get out of the murmuration pattern, it only looks cool when you are not a part of it and can see it from a distance.
If all the soils are depleted all over the world, how is this being determined? How are they testing all of the soils all over the world? How do we know that the fruits and vegetables are actually devoid of nutrients compared to 5 years ago, 50, or even 100 years ago? What advanced testing methods were employed at the turn of the century to compare with our testing methods today? If the soils don’t have nutrients, does that mean it is a depleted soil for the life of the soil? Can soil be restored and generate healthy foods, and if so how long until it produces nutritious foods? What about the regenerative farms that don’t use tilling and add compost, natural planted vegetation, and pastured animals? Is that soil also depleted forever? How much of the soil layer is depleted: the topsoil, the deeper layers? What specific tests do we have to determine the health and nutrients of a fruit, vegetable, or plant? When they say that as soon as a plant is picked, it loses its nutrients with each passing second, how are they determining this? If it is anything like my discovery of how they determine calories then it would all be made up horse sh@%. Stick around because, as always, both sides have some less than honest, shady research, some sketchy tests, and a "follow the money" line of reporting.
What are the different types of soil testing? This is what they test and rectified with pounds of chemicals added to the soil. This is corporate farming at its finest. If you interfere with the natural way of things this is what you are left with.
Soil testing evaluates various components to assess soil and crop health, focusing on specific nutrients and conditions. pH measurement determines soil acidity or alkalinity using pH meters, important for nutrient availability. Macronutrient analysis for nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium frequently uses extraction techniques such as the Bray Test, designed for phosphorus assessment in neutral to low pH soils, and Mehlich 3, which extracts multiple nutrients, including calcium, magnesium, and others, followed by spectrophotometric (just measure a concentration in a sample, not specific compounds. It’s uses are very limited. Secondary nutrients like calcium, magnesium, and sulfur are similarly reviewed to ensure adequate soil presence. Micronutrient tests measure iron, manganese, zinc, and copper, assessing trace elements vital for plant health. Supplementary tests include determining organic matter content via loss on ignition, evaluating cation exchange capacity (CEC) for nutrient retention capabilities, analyzing soil texture for composition insights, and conducting salinity tests to monitor salt levels, all contributing to a holistic understanding of soil's ability to nurture robust crop growth.The tests for a plants nutrient levels are just as sketchy.
If you only take from your garden or field, you are left without a biofield, biome, microbes, and everything a natural landscape has. The wild world has achieved homeostasis. The photo above if from yesterday’s hike on top of a mountain. It doesn’t need anything but to be left natural, eaten by animals, the skat fertilizing the soil growing for the needs of the ecosystem, sunlight and occasional rain. Even the chemtrails don’t seem to be having to much affect. You don’t need to water, fertilize, till, and weed. It is perfect as it is because nature only knows harmony. Regenerative, no-till, biodynamic farming and growing require principles directly from God and Mother Nature. The mechanisms employed simply give back what you take. If you only have vegetables in a garden and harvest, prune, and take, you will be left with deficient crappy soils. OBVIOUSLY. But only those with brainwashed craniums would do this. Just add back the rest of the plants you don’t use, let them decay naturally, and add back in ALL the plant compost in the spring; just lay it on top of the soil. Give back what you have taken. Don’t cut down the plants when they go to seed; let them finish their full life cycle and give you seeds to repopulate the area. Use the dried stalks as ground cover. When removing unwanted plants, do so with intent. Don’t dig them out; see how you can incorporate them into the garden. They are there to protect, repair and add nutrients to the soil. Add in healthy, diluted urine at specific times in the growing season. Let nature guide you in how to plant.
Even though I can’t stand most of the stuff Berg posts, he does a decent exposé on the soil deficiency lie. He tells you 80% truth (he’s on our side!) and the 20% (well he has to make a living right-((net worth 6 million)) is PUSHING toxic supplements and sketchy vitamins he sells. But for my purposes for the article,. Berg introduces the work of Donald Sparks, considered an expert in the field of soil management, took samples from all over the world and discovered that they contain plenty of nutrients and a complete amount of minerals and were “just fine.” Dr. David Johnson, with the Institute for Sustainable Agriculture, found that the soils with the highest tested levels of nutrients DID NOT produce the plants with the best plant growth. Not only that, if a fruit plant or vegetable is grown to maturation without any visible defects, that plant is health for you to eat, provided they didn’t use chemicals to produce. The issue only comes in with residues left in the plant from chemical fertilizers, pesticides round up ready herbicides etc. A healthy plant is a healthy plant.
What they did find, however, was that the best predictor of plant health was the fungal-to-bacterial ratio. Johnson discovered that the use of chemicals on crops will slowly kill off the fungus, leading to an overgrowth of bacteria only. He describes the fungus as the essential element to break down the rocks, sand, and plant material, making the minerals bioavailable to the growing plants. The same is true if you try and take a mineral on its own-impossible without the plants FIRST taking them up and then making them BIOAVAILABLE to you. Sorry you can’t make a chemical copy out of other chemicals and call it good. You have to eat the plant, there are no short cuts or hacks to nutrition. Sorry Ben Greenfield and Dave Ass-prey.
What does make a soil healthy? Besides leaving it alone, and making sure you don’t take without equal give? The fungus and bacteria in a 1:1 ratio make for healthy soil and makes these minerals soluble for the plant to take them up and have a healthy soil environment for the flora and fauna. If you are ingesting something that has not been made bioavailable for your body to consume, like zinc, magnesium, calcium, you may experience nausea, diarrhea, and other effects of consuming something the body is not able to process and break down. That’s the plant's and animal's job that we then eat for bioavailable nutrients and energy. And remember in nature, the animals eat the plant and the waste from the animal goes directly back to the soil, as intended.
The soil-depletion narrative is rather misleading; plants need sun, water, in-range temperatures, and certain nutrients to grow. Without essential minerals in the soil, plants will not be able to grow; simple as that. If they do grow, they will be small, deformed and taste terrible. It will be obvious.
Plants can take up minerals like calcium, zinc, and magnesium, depending on the soil, and will have higher mineral counts in soils with higher minerals. A plant's mineral content can also change with the seasons and growth duration; again, this should be obvious. The notion of "vitamin-depleted" soils doesn't make much sense—plants synthesize soil material and phytochemicals independently, determined by their general makeup not soil. Again, they simply won’t grow in poor soil;. not grow and be less nutritious. Post-harvest, nutrients do not decrease as we have been lead to believe, nor does cooking and handling unless you boil it and turn the water green-that leaches nutrients of course. Eating fresh in-season fruits, vegetables, and plants is the key, consuming a wide variety and finding a local farmer that grows like you would. Support them now before they disappear.
The myth surrounding nutrient depletion in crops stems from research being misinterpreted to push certain agendas. If you fell for the soils are deficient lie, you also HAVE to believe in the climate change carbon agenda, because they use the same religion science.
Some studies have indeed noted declines in nutrient content over time, but context is key. For instance, a 2004 study often cited to support the idea of "nutrient-depleted" soil actually emphasizes that current fruits and vegetables remain some of our most nutrient-dense foods. Factors other than soil mineral concentration, like crop variety and harvest conditions, largely influence nutrient levels. While nutrient declines have been noted, they result from corporate run, higher crop yields rather than soil deficiencies. Modern agricultural practices, including the use of CHEMICALS fertilizers, ensure nutrients are present in crops so the produce grows as it would in the wild. Claims of severe nutrient loss are only “statistically significant” with some massive number massaging, but don’t have anything to do with the actual nutrient content of the plants and health for those of us eating it. Again, whole foods provide adequate nutrients. The real issue lies in the chemicals used in the farming process, from chemical fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides, and pesticides to vitamin fortification and the other 8,000+ chemicals the FDA allows in our food and beverage supply. That's the problem—not “deficient” soils giving us a “less nutritious” fruits and vegetables. Corporate run farms using methods that destroy the ecosystem and leave chemicals on the food might be the problem.
How are plants tested against other plants from 100 years ago to determine their nutrient density. If this were the case then why would compost be so rich and nutritious for your garden? Maybe food gets more ripe, flavorful and nutritious after it is picked? Or some becomes more bioavailable. We of course will never get to the truth through the industries, research and screen influencers. But your body will know and guide you to eat what your body requires for homeostasis, if you know how to listen. Take responsibility for your health. The following expert from the national library of medicine, determines how they extract the “vitamins” from the sample to determine the nutrient density. As we already know, vitamins are a made up concept from the pharmaceutical industry. So they are using a unibombers storage shed’s worth of chemicals to “extract” the nutrients. The same process is used to compare with older plants they grind up into a powder and used the chemicals listed below. And the same process is used to sell you the line that once picked fruits and vegetables lose their nutrients. Once again, I’m calling BS. Read below for one example of how they get vitamin A (it doesn’t matter the vitamin, similar extraction method, different chemicals) to see if you agree with my synopsis.
“To assist the evaluation and development of methods for vitamin A, a reference LC method was designed for the analysis of foods and tissues. The method involved saponification of substantial amounts of sample in ethanolic pyrogallol. A small portion of the digest was extracted in centrifuge tubes, and the extract was evaporated under nitrogen in the presence of a trace of nonvolatile hexadecane. The residue was subjected to LC on a silica column. All-trans retinol was eluted after 5 minutes and small amounts of 13-cis isomer were eluted a minute earlier.
Click on the video below to answer each and everyone of the following questions:
All the soils deficient?
Did you test for the nutrient density of plants, fruits and vegetables?
Did you measure nutrient levels of plants 100 years ago to today’s levels?
Deficiency Diseases are caused by Deficient Soils?
Fruits and Vegetables lose nutrients after they are cut.
Pavement is forever?
Yes my friends, they made it all up. But only because they want you to buy their chemicals in the form of fertilizers for your garden and chemicals in the form of vitamins and supplements for you and your family. Well not you because you are awake and aware of the mind control tactics and can think for yourself, no profiteering interpreters necessary. Thank you for supporting my substack, research and allowing me to live my potential and purpose. I will never sell out, sell chemicals and promote someone else’s garbage through affiliate links. Your support is greatly appreciated.
I was the bird chasing after zinc, iodine, and vitamin D3—almost falling for ivermectin—until the relentless emails from medical suppliers wore me down. They bombarded me with messages every day, reminding me that ivermectin was still in my cart, urging me to buy.
I've already had a bad experience self-medicating with something as basic as salt, which led to chronic headaches, severe skin issues, and more. Now, I'm starting to see the truth: the so-called "alternative medicine" industry is just another trap—another layer of deception targeting the "awake" community.
Good read! Most people are so far removed from where food comes from, how it grows, and even what season it is makes much of the common sense gardening tips in this article not so common anymore. I think the larger point here beyond the soil and the nutrients is having blind faith in the "facts, statistics and science" without ever asking why or how they came to be true.